Tullus Hostilius

The Horatii and Curiatii fight to the death

The idea of champions representing the fate of a city state was a risky business. If your champion won, it was a bloodless victory. If he lost, there was the temptation to refute the result. The fight of the Horatii and Curiatii was an example of such a contest. It was further complicated because the two families were related by law (through intermarriage).

Oath of the Horatii by Jacques-Louis David, 1784.
At the center of the action is the father holding three swords while his three sons swear an oath to defend Rome against the Curiatii, who are from Alba Longa. But this is not a simple issue of fighting three enemy champions. One of the three women grieving is of the Curiatii family and married to Horatius man. The third, in the light dress, Camilla, is a Horatius woman betrothed to one of the Curiatii who will be fighting. Furthermore, Alba Longa is the mother city to Rome. So this coming contest is very much a family affair. And there will be grieving in this household no matter who wins or loses.

The two armies sat down before their respective camps, free rather from present danger than from anxiety: for the sovereign power was at stake, depending on the valor and fortune of so few. Accordingly, therefore, eager and anxious, they have their attention intensely riveted on a spectacle far from pleasing. The signal is given: and the three youths on each side, as if in battle-array, rush to the charge with determined fury, bearing in their breasts the spirits of mighty armies: nor do the one or the other regard their personal danger; the public dominion or slavery is present to their mind, and the fortune of their country, which was ever after destined to be such as they should now establish it. As soon as their arms clashed on the first encounter, and their burnished swords glittered, great horror strikes the spectators; and, hope inclining to neither side, their voice and breath were suspended. Then having engaged hand to hand, when not only the movements of their bodies, and the rapid brandishing of their arms and weapons, but wounds also and blood were seen, two of the Romans fell lifeless, one upon the other, the three Albans being wounded. And when the Alban army raised a shout of joy at their fall, hope entirely, anxiety however not yet, deserted the Roman legions, alarmed for the lot of the one, whom the three Curiatii surrounded. He happened to be unhurt, so that, though alone he was by no means a match for them all together, yet he was confident against each singly. In order therefore to separate their attack, he takes to flight, presuming that they would pursue him with such swiftness as the wounded state of his body would suffer each. He had now fled a considerable distance from the place where they had fought, when, looking behind, he perceives them pursuing him at great intervals from each other; and that one of them was not far from him. On him he turned round with great fury. And whilst the Alban army shouts out to the Curiatii to succour their brother, Horatius, victorious in having slain his antagonist, was now proceeding to a second attack. Then the Romans encourage their champion with a shout such as is usually [given] by persons cheering in consequence of unexpected success: he also hastens to put an end to the combat. Wherefore before the other, who was not far off, could come up he dispatches the second Curiatius also. And now, the combat being brought to an equality of numbers, one on each side remained, but they were equal neither in hope nor in strength. The one his body untouched by a weapon, and a double victory made courageous for a third contest: the other dragging along his body exhausted from the wound, exhausted from running, and dispirited by the slaughter of his brethren before his eyes, presents himself to his victorious antagonist. Nor was that a fight. The Roman, exulting, says, “Two I have offered to the shades of my brothers: the third I will offer to the cause of this war, that the Roman may rule over the Alban.” He thrusts his sword down into his throat, whilst faintly sustaining the weight of his armor: he strips him as he lies prostrate. The Romans receive Horatius with triumph and congratulation; with so much the greater joy, as success had followed so close on fear. They then turn to the burial of their friends with dispositions by no means alike; for the one side was elated with [the acquisition of] empire, the other subjected to foreign jurisdiction: their sepulchers are still extant in the place where each fell; the two Roman ones in one place nearer to Alba, the three Alban ones towards Rome; but distant in situation from each other, and just as they fought.

Before they parted from thence, when Mettus, in conformity to the treaty which had been concluded, asked what orders he had to give, Tullus orders him to keep the youth in arms; that he designed to employ them if a war should break out with the Veientes.

Horatius slays his sister

After this both armies returned to their homes. Horatius marched foremost, carrying before him the spoils of the three brothers: his sister, a maiden who had been betrothed to one of the Curiatii, met him before the gate Capena: and having recognized her lover’s military robe, which she herself had wrought, on her brother’s shoulders, she tore her hair, and with bitter wailings called by name on her deceased lover. The sister’s lamentations in the midst of his own victory, and of such great public rejoicings, raised the indignation of the excited youth. Having therefore drawn his sword, he run the damsel through the body, at the same time chiding her in these words: “Go hence, with thy unseasonable love to thy spouse, forgetful of thy dead brothers, and of him who survives, forgetful of thy native country. So perish every Roman woman who shall mourn an enemy.” This action seemed shocking to the fathers and to the people; but his recent services outweighed its guilt. Nevertheless he was carried before the king for judgment. The king, that he himself might not be the author of a decision so melancholy, and so disagreeable to the people, or of the punishment consequent on that decision, having summoned an assembly of the people, says, “I appoint, according to law, duumvirs to pass sentence on Horatius for treason.” The law was of dreadful import. “Let the duumvirs pass sentence for treason. If he appeal from the duumvirs, let him contend by appeal; if they shall gain the cause, cover his head; hang him by a rope from a gallows; scourge him either within the pomerium or without the pomerium.” When the duumvirs appointed by this law, who did not consider that, according to the law, they could acquit even an innocent person, had found him guilty; one of them says, “P. Horatius, I judge thee guilty of treason. Go, lictor, bind his hands.” The lictor had approached him, and was fixing the rope. Then Horatius, by the advice of Tullus, a favourable interpreter of the law, says, “I appeal.” Accordingly the matter was contested by appeal to the people. On that trial persons were much affected, especially by P. Horatius the father declaring, that he considered his daughter deservedly slain; were it not so, that he would by his authority as a father have inflicted punishment on his son.[40] He then entreated that they would not render childless him whom but a little while ago they had beheld with a fine progeny. During these words the old man, having embraced the youth, pointing to the spoils of the Curiatii fixed up in that place which is now called Pila Horatia, “Romans,” said he, “can you bear to see bound beneath a gallows amidst scourges and tortures, him whom you just now beheld marching decorated [with spoils] and exulting in victory; a sight so shocking as the eyes even of the Albans could scarcely endure. Go, lictor, bind those hands, which but a little while since, being armed, established sovereignty for the Roman people. Go, cover the head of the liberator of this city; hang him on the gallows; scourge him, either within the pomerium, so it be only amid those javelins and spoils of the enemy; or without the pomerium, only amid the graves of the Curiatii. For whither can you bring this youth, where his own glories must not redeem him from such ignominy of punishment?” in every danger; and acquitted him more through admiration of his bravery, than for the justice of his cause. But that so notorious a murder might be atoned for by some expiation, the father was commanded to make satisfaction for the son at the public charge. He, having offered certain expiatory sacrifices, which were ever after continued in the Horatian family, and laid a beam across the street, made his son pass under it as under a yoke, with his head covered. This remains even to this day, being constantly repaired at the expense of the public; they call it Sororium Tigillum. A tomb of square stone was erected to Horatia in the place where she was stabbed and fell.

Livy. The History of Rome in Three Volumes by Livy (Unexpurgated Edition) (Halcyon Classics) (Kindle Locations 565-628). Halcyon Press Ltd. Kindle Edition.

Oath of the Horatii by Jacques-Louis David, 1784.
This is a study done for the famous painting. It is executed in the neoclassical style.

Tullus Hostilius Commands the death of the alban dictator and the destruction of alba longa

Although the Alban champions (the three Curiatii brothers) were defeated, the Alban dictator, Matus Fuffetius, went about the business of undoing the result of the outcome through subterfuge. He stoked conflict between Fidenae and Rome. Fuffetius also got the Etruscan city of Veii involved. In battle with Fidenae and Veii, with the Albans as supposed allies, Fuffetius, at a crucial moment, marched his troops off the battlefield. Tullus Hostilius, through some quick thinking, persuaded the Romans that the Alban move was a stratagem designed to flank the enemy. But he also managed to convey this idea to the Fidenae troops and caused them to panic, thus carrying the day. After the battle, Tullus had Fuffetius executed and the city of Alba Longa destroyed.

The population of Alba Longa was absorbed into the Roman body politic, its population settled on the Caelian Hill. Leading Alban families were added to the Patrician grouping: Julii, Servilii, Quinctii, Geganii, Curiatii and Cloeli. Because the Senate increased in size as a result of the Alban migration, Tullus built a larger meeting house to accommodate the new member. The new Senate building was called the Curia Hostilia. The Royal Council met here and eventually the Senate as well.

Tullus Hostilius goes to war with the Sabines

We know that the Sabines were coequals to the Romans in the Roman state. We also know that in very ancient times they occupied the Capitoline Hill as well as the Quirinal. The Sabine tribe covered much of central Italy and one group of Sabines was incorporated into the Roman state. In fact, they were given a tribal name, Taties, of their own and they were one of the three original tribes of Rome (Ramnes, Taties and Luceres). The remainder of the tribe stayed outside the ambit of the Roman state and often found itself at war with it. This in spite of the fact that some of the Roman kings (Titus Tatius, Tullus Hostilius, Ancus Marcius) were of Sabine descent.

At the battle of Malitiosa, the Romans, their strength newly augmented by Alban infantry and cavalry, crushed the Sabines.

Livy. The History of Rome in Three Volumes by Livy (Unexpurgated Edition) (Halcyon Classics) (Kindle Location, 690). Halcyon Press Ltd. Kindle Edition.

Plague strikes Rome, Tullus Hostilius Gets Religion, he is Killed by Lightening

A plague struck Rome, killing many. Tullus, as a result, because he was superstitious, performed sacrifices to Jupiter. However, he didn’t perform the rituals correctly and was punished by the gods for his lack of piety by being struck by lightning.

The Rule of Tullus Hostilius–Summary

Tullus Hostilius was known for two things: 1) doubling the size of the Roman citizen rolls, and 2) leaving Rome militarily stronger than he found it. Hostilius was war-like and not particularly religious. This stands in sharp contrast to Numa Pompilius, who was deeply interested in the spiritual world and committed to peace. Nevertheless, when Hostilius was presented with an opportunity to bloodlessly expand the Roman state by allowing a contest of champions to determine the future of the Roman state, he took the risk. And he won.

BACK